It's all relative to the line. Cueto, imo (in model's opinion) is being valued like an ace. Not quite Dan Haren, but he's actually a fairly average #3 kind of guy. Jurrjens, imo, is valued like the luckbox he is. Nothing to fade, except Garland, who I think is much worse than valued by the market.
You are going against Cueto because of his BABIP and HR/FB rates. Jurrjens has similarly low numbers yet you are backing the Braves. Please explain?
ReplyDeleteIt's all relative to the line. Cueto, imo (in model's opinion) is being valued like an ace. Not quite Dan Haren, but he's actually a fairly average #3 kind of guy. Jurrjens, imo, is valued like the luckbox he is. Nothing to fade, except Garland, who I think is much worse than valued by the market.
ReplyDelete