Tuesday, December 1, 2009

BYU o136

East Carolina +12
Duke -3 (sigh)
Irvine -2

8 comments:

  1. How much of this year's data are you currently using vis a vis projected numbers? This is about the time where I struggle with the optimal ratio of projected/actual.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It depends mostly on the composition of the teams versus last year. Given fairly similar teams, last year still dominates for me absent a major change.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also keep in mind many of the games to date have been David vs. Goliath revenue-fests with scrubs running a muck for a good portion of the game. Not as indicative of future performance as results of conference games.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Would you mind saying to what number you would still make plays? (I assume there is more leeway with totals)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks that makes sense but never occurred to me. One more question. How do you figure out expected win percentage? Use a half point calc to figure your win expectancy for each bet and then find the average?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Seeing the Irvine score makes me rage rage rage at not jumping on the bets I could this morning and instead napping again.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Weird, earlier comment got deleted.

    I just said to use push %s with eWin% or actual win% to figure out at what point a line has moved too much. 1 pt on spreads (non pk,1,extreme faves) and 2 pts on totals is probably too much movement to tail, generally.

    I figure out expected win% by using my database of all CBB closing lines vs game results to determine push%. The difference between my line and the closing line, with the sum of the push% + 50% = eWin%.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Meh don't rage, 1-2-1 today imo.

    I hate Duke, should probably stop betting them as they pwn my soul every year regardless of equity.

    ReplyDelete