Saturday, March 28, 2009
Friday, March 27, 2009
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Baseball model is finished. It's not any different than last year except it's not a total PECOTA whore this time. Season starts in a couple weeks.
Baseball is a lot like CBB, or just about any sport. Openers for the first month or two of the season can be way off. It took books weeks to adjust to consistent early Rays betting last year, although they're probably an extreme example. If you bet it, start early, imo.
Bodog Still Sucks at Props
Monday, March 23, 2009
Greek has some tourny futures up, including what I think are fair ~ prices on Michigan St. FF (+325), Connecticut to win (+665), and UNC FF/to make final (-155/+155). Really only useful if you need to hedge a small amount and have most of the dogs still in the race.
Duke (+1615), Memphis (+805), and Kansas (+3250) also all have about fair odds to win on Greek if you need to hedge there.
I don't think anything but Michigan St. FF has much value on it's own.
March Madness Week to Date
So I spent some time earlier talking about how donkarific some of the openers are for the first weekend of March Madness. Capping results:
Spreads: 6-5 (eWin%: 55.4%)
Totals: 3-3 (eWin%: 55.6%)
Running a half-win below expectation unfortunately, but March didn't get any sharper this year. Sweet Sixteen and beyond will probably be more difficult.
Spreads: 6-5 (eWin%: 55.4%)
Totals: 3-3 (eWin%: 55.6%)
Running a half-win below expectation unfortunately, but March didn't get any sharper this year. Sweet Sixteen and beyond will probably be more difficult.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Taking Xavier +7 and Zaga +8.5 small.
Market bracket is up. It's facially strange how odds get worse for some teams that win games, but a lot of that early equity is wrapped in top teams' upset potential. 1/2/3 seeds aren't losing. The odds of them winning all 24 games was really small.
Remember that this bracket is done on a snapshot basis. The Pinnacle moneylines are obviously very fresh, so I'll redo this in a couple days when the lines sharpen a bit. Or, if some gigantic 2pt movement occurs or something.
Market bracket is up. It's facially strange how odds get worse for some teams that win games, but a lot of that early equity is wrapped in top teams' upset potential. 1/2/3 seeds aren't losing. The odds of them winning all 24 games was really small.
Remember that this bracket is done on a snapshot basis. The Pinnacle moneylines are obviously very fresh, so I'll redo this in a couple days when the lines sharpen a bit. Or, if some gigantic 2pt movement occurs or something.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Friday, March 20, 2009
Just Pick Winners?
Bleh, a gross 6-11 past three days with average expected win% of 54.2%
Equity is worthless imo
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Just going through Bodog's props real quick. Limits are $150, so nothing to get too excited about. Greek had some great last longers (Clemson v. BC -130, Purdue vs. FSU -130, etc) but those pretty much insta-move when hit, so I can't post those up here really. They look about fair for the most part right now.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
March Madness Bracket Odds
March madness bracket odds are over on the right finally, and it's my best estimation of a true market bracket. All the first round games' win percentages should roughly match up with Pinny as of a couple hours ago. Again, mostly I just tweaked high level efficiency stats to get as close as possible to deriving the 1st round line, and past two games' lines. Actual game lines could easily be off by a point or two in the next round, there's really no way to hit it completely on the head with a high level formula. But, it hopefully tempers some of the more major over/under expectations of KenPom vs. market. Using spread -> ML conversions also avoids the log5 underrating big faves problem.
One major caveat: teams are static throughout the entire tournament in this analysis. Fairly obviously, a 10 seed making a run to the Final Four is probably going to be less of a dog in the Final Four than they'd be against that same team right now. A 1 seed in the FF is more likely to have simply met expectations, and won't see a similar market boost. So, favorites' odds are probably somewhat overstated, underdogs' odds somewhat understated. North Carolina is very overstated if Lawson is seriously hurt. This presumes healthy Lawson.
Monday, March 16, 2009
Will a #1 ranked seed (Louisville, Pittsburgh, Connecticut, North Carolina) win the March Madness 2009 Tournament?
-No +190 has sick value (+100 fair)
Totals:
UCLA o135 (small)
Cuse u134.5 (big)
ASU u124
WVA u129
Memphis u132.5
Other tournaments (all small):
UNLV +7.5
Washington St. +4
Troy -1
Kentucky u135
Washington St. u120
Pacific u128.5
K St. u138
Vermont o145.5
Sunday, March 15, 2009
I'm out to Vegas in the morning, so I'll miss totals if they come out then. I'd expect a market odds bracket to be up fairly late tomorrow night. So long as the books get their props out, I'll be done hitting most of what I need to by then.
Duke +2750 on Greek is off (not finished, but prob 17-1 by market).
So is Louisville last longer vs. UConn +120 and Louisville vs. UNC +200 on Greek. Those lines should be something more like -150 and +120, but again, not quite finished with market odds. UConn's draw is horrible, Louisville's is the easiest path of the #1s.
Duke +2750 on Greek is off (not finished, but prob 17-1 by market).
So is Louisville last longer vs. UConn +120 and Louisville vs. UNC +200 on Greek. Those lines should be something more like -150 and +120, but again, not quite finished with market odds. UConn's draw is horrible, Louisville's is the easiest path of the #1s.
I'm almost done making a market odds bracket for the real thing. It'll be up late tomorrow. There's probably already 80 zillion KenPom log5 brackets out there if you're jonesing.
Openers:
Cal pk
Minnesota +4.5
American +18.5
Morgan St. +17.5
Robert Morris +17.5
Wisconsin +3 (small)
Ohio St. -3 (small)
Michigan +6 (small)
Openers:
Cal pk
Minnesota +4.5
American +18.5
Morgan St. +17.5
Robert Morris +17.5
Wisconsin +3 (small)
Ohio St. -3 (small)
Michigan +6 (small)
Wash -4.5 (small)
small steam chase gogogog:
Marquette -4.5
WV -9
That's it for now, probably.
That's it for now, probably.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Probably no plays tomorrow. I'm leaving for the day very early, and I have no clue when these totals for the 10AM games are going to show up.
The futures/props have started out better than ever. I had max amounts of:
Zaga +100
Kent St. +1200
Akron +800, +650
Temple +550
ASU +650
WV +1500
UNC +150 (bad in retrospect because of Lawson's injury)
Ended up somewhere around 6u, and wouldv'e been a little more if I hadn't hedged so damn much, but EG is EG.
I don't know how quickly March props will come up once brackets are announced, but it's criminal not to be well funded at several sites for this. I'll throw up anything I spot as usual.
The futures/props have started out better than ever. I had max amounts of:
Zaga +100
Kent St. +1200
Akron +800, +650
Temple +550
ASU +650
WV +1500
UNC +150 (bad in retrospect because of Lawson's injury)
Ended up somewhere around 6u, and wouldv'e been a little more if I hadn't hedged so damn much, but EG is EG.
I don't know how quickly March props will come up once brackets are announced, but it's criminal not to be well funded at several sites for this. I'll throw up anything I spot as usual.
Nice! Psyched out Gamblor apparently, since the 2H sides that helped the game bets went 3-1 today.
3-1 on the day, one total flat, one a couple points of equity, big equity on Missouri side, and not much movement on the FSU side. The FSU line seemed like an anomaly. +9 is about two points worse than I'd expect with Lawson, and that team seems a hell of lot worse than two points without the most efficient player in the nation and virtually nothing talented to replace him. Market knows better I guess.
3/15
No sides, totals are late.
3-1 on the day, one total flat, one a couple points of equity, big equity on Missouri side, and not much movement on the FSU side. The FSU line seemed like an anomaly. +9 is about two points worse than I'd expect with Lawson, and that team seems a hell of lot worse than two points without the most efficient player in the nation and virtually nothing talented to replace him. Market knows better I guess.
3/15
No sides, totals are late.
Friday, March 13, 2009
Bracketologists
The Bracket Project keeps track of a crapload of internet and TV bracketologists, and updates their selections daily. Here's a link to a giant matrix of those various bracketologists' predictions as of last night.
I don't know if there's much wisdom in the aggregate, since a large chunk of these guys must have a learning disability. I'll bet my grandmother that Oakland and Weber St. don't make the tournament. But, remove the whackos and there might be something to it.
I'm not entirely sure if their bracket is just an aggregate of everyone they survey, or if they do their own, but it looks much better than B101. They also have Memphis as a #1 seed, which I'm not sure about, but I love seeing it on paper given how much of their futures I have. Bracket Project's aggregate bracket, or whatever it is, is here:
That bracket will be over on the right shortly. Ultimately the seeding and regions aren't huge deal-breakers for futures, provided you have some diversification. But, it's helpful to have at least a couple scenarios. That way you know whether to pound 40-1 on the strip when 20-1 looks fair in one bracket, or if the value is just a mirage because their draw is best case scenario.
Deja Vu x 13,546
2-3 today on the big bets made last night, with 2-0 totals, 0-3 sides, still ended up slightly because of higher bets on totals, but this. is. getting. absurd.
Guess how you would have done betting those 2H line that helped the big game bets. Yep, 1-4 again. This is nuts, I'm approaching lottery ticket territory with the 2H screwage over the past could hundred bets. If it goes on any longer I'm just auto-hedging everything at the half on the assumption I've stumbled ass backwards into some miraculous method of predicting 2H losers at a high 50's% rate with a full-game handicapping system. Part of me isn't 100% joking either, I mean, we're getting out there with the standard deviations on the null hypothesis that these 2Hs are coinflips.
Anyway, equity was great again. All three sides had 1.5 points of equity (each is ~56% to win) the two totals had about 1 and 3.5 points equity, but of course <.500 once more. Nothing in late game went right again, each side blew a late lead, and two teams allow offensive rebounds with seconds remaining on FTs that prevent them from even trying to send it to OT. Std.
The much smaller late bets did well, 4-1, but I didn't have enough on them. I'm a little surprised at the equity I got betting that late - which I guess makes sense for lines that don't even come out until morning. I'll probably continue adding normal sized bets (mostly totals likely) in the mid-morning going forward even if I'm late to open by a couple hours. I probably won't get the best number, but I don't think being an hour late or so is akin to dart throwing anymore, after having looked back through all the movement over the last couple days for the late lines.
March Madness Bracket Odds
Lunardi's bracket is updating every day now. His new one is over on the right. Big winners recently (in Pom) are Zaga and WV.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Retrospective
Something I haven't really covered is the progression of equity throughout the year.
I'm not an authority on CBB, but I have pretty good knowledge derived from data analysis, plus I know a few people who have been at this longer than I have and do this professionally. And no, I'm not talking about random 50 year old guy who lives in Vegas, reads box scores all day, and makes decisions overusing concepts like "motivation" or "they're due", or rely on sample sizes of three games to make definitive conclusions. I mean the career lineshoppers with large valuable databases.
Very succinctly, CBB is pretty beatable, and it stays that way throughout the year (for totals at least). Totals are far easier to beat. Anyway, there's a reason limits are lower for CBB, and lower for totals. The first few months, through January or so, it's not uncommon to beat totals by 7+ points or sides by 2+ points on a fairly regular basis. In recent history, close isn't even efficient during this period. It's actually profitable to bet large lines moves AFTER the steam is finished, for many subsets. Lines just don't get moved enough. I don't know if that's a function of low limits and limited volume to sufficiently move lines, or what. In the 2nd half of the season, openers sharpen, 1 point on sides and 3 or 4 points on totals are more frequently the best movements of your day. Betting after steam is still >50%, but doesn't beat vig. Essentially, for a winning bettor, your equity against close for the first half of the year is understated, but it's a good barometer for the 2nd half of the season. This season bears out the dramatic change in the market pretty strikingly.
It hovers around 57%, and then crashes down to 54%. Last year was identical. My totals system has never changed. I've only paid more attention to recency biases after about a month at 53%, and gained about 1% of equity for it. I'm not sure what happens, like if some switch gets flipped at the line makers book and they go from 'thumb in the wind' or 'just use last years lines' to a more technical analysis with current season stats. Limits are low, so it's not terribly costly to let bettors sharpen your lines when data is scarce in the beginning of the year. Midway through, it's pretty easy to make a line. In the long run, over the 2nd half, my actual winning percentage shouldn't deviate much from the 54%, assuming I can keep getting the equity.
I ran over expected (60%+) at the start, which happened last year as well, and has for many other people. Close just isn't efficient. Around the drop, I've typically run almost exactly at expectation, plus a very small handicapping edge from a close that still isn't truly efficient, but not exploitable on it's own either. I'm running a little below expectation over the last 75 or so because I can't buy a 1 or 2pt win and run really bad at avoiding or hitting overtimes. Going forward, 54-55% is roughly expectation.
The sides are a similar story. They get more action and have higher limits, making it progressively harder after the midseason magical switch flip. Unless you play just a game or two per day, or less, you likely don't get enough equity against close to cover vig. The value there is totally derived from a (hopefully) small handicapping edge that gets you around 53%. At this point in the year, for sides I'd really do better to just focus on lineshopping and get in before steam fully moves something. The expectation should be about the same if you're any good at it, and it's less work. But, I'm addicted to this stuff and don't have time to squat on Pinnacle and race to insta-hit any line that twitches.
Assuming Cal under loses (it's a huge dog right now): 1-3-1 today, with an OT under kill and flurry of points in final 13 seconds to push maryland.
Every total had 2-4 pts of equity, some of the biggest moves off open all day. And again, 1-4 vs. the 2H line that helps the game line obv, with the 1 win vs the 2H line already a huge favorite at the half. This has been going on for weeks, so frustrating.
Just for fun (massochism): Record on totals, last five weeks, final score 2.5pts or less from my lines: 4-14. For within 1.5 pts of my line, 1-8. Record was only even for those before the last five weeks. Big negative OT unders vs OT overs disparity too.
3/13
Wisconsin -1.5
Texas -3
BYU -1.5
Totals:
Louisville u143
LSU u140.5
Late morning adds (Getting in after movements, unlikey to get equity. Update: wow, these did get equity, I'm not used to this kind of movement past noon. Probably standard when games are added in the morning. System probably is still valid missing morning openers - I'll continue to bet and track late adds assuming I get up early enough to not totally miss the boat.)
Tenn u150
CSUN -2.5
LA Tech +10
ASU u140.5
Holy Cross +5
I'll prob be adding some sides in a bit. Pretty good equity on the totals, so I don't feel like a schmuck for going under heavy. Starting out with a Miami FL under win, and the Ball St. under just got blown up by an overtime. Running just insanely terrible in the last minute of these conference tournament games, if you need someone to miss/hit a FT, it's not happening.
Also FYI, if you got the bet, I'm hedging some of the Buffalo/Kent St. Game. That $300 to win $3600 is currently worth ~$925. Just betting enough to win $300 and recoup losses. If you lose you get most of the equity back in the implied worth of the Kent St. position. Either team will be big favorites (~8) against Ball St., then the final game will be another near coinflip against Miami OH or Akron in all probability. In that scenario it's worth more around $750-$800, but there's value in the chance Miami OH/Akron loses to Bowling Green or Ohio (inferior by several points).
I have a slightly +EV Miami OH position, so I'm not doing the same with Akron, which has less equity in it anyway (the $300 is worth ~$550).
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
3/12
VT u138.5Maryland u143
Ball St. u116.5
Utah St. u134
California u139.5
Yeah - all unders, but totals openers to date for tournament games have generally been exhibiting about 3-4 pts+ under what I'd expect to see during conference play. Todays lines, for some of the tournys, aren't following the trend. I don't know what the deal is, but there's definitely been statistical justification for the several point drop in totals over prior years tournaments. Shrug, be wary of these possibly.
3-1 totals today, good equity. Just a smidge of equity on sides, which went 1-2-1. Again, totals clearly have higher edges, I'm generally betting half units on sides and full units on totals. Come opening round after selection Sunday, that's definitely going to change. Spread lines get made for Joe Public too, and some start way off.
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Conference Tournament Maket Odds
I'm using current Pinnacle (or BM for Thursday) lines for upcoming games plus the past two conference games lines as predictors of projected game lines for every possible matchup in the bracket, then dropping it in the tournament matrix. I'll keep tracking MAC for any of you who managed to get Kent St. +1200 or Akron +800.
The schedules and seeding are here: Conference Tournament Schedules
March Madness Bracket Odds
Most sites seem to be on hiatus with March futures right now, but Bracketology 101's new bracket will be up on the right in the next few minutes.
Update: Or not, they won't bother to put up the bracket, they just list teams and seeds and I don't feel like snaking through it to put everyone in the right region. They have some teams still in that seem ridiculous too, so I'm losing my faith in them. If anyone knows of a better prognasticator, let me know and I'll start using them. They make Lunardi look brilliant, and he doesn't even forecast remaining schedules.
Anyway, I am about to create some Google docs with market odds (well as best as I can do to predict future lines) on the conference tournments that have yet to start. I'll keep a running one for MAC too, in case you got in on Akron or Kent St. Hopefully it'll help spot some value, as some pretty square books have started to put up conference tournament futures.
Monday, March 9, 2009
FYI SEC tourny Odds changed to reflect yesterday's games and 1.5 pts HCA for Florida.
Also, I used the moneylines for tomorrow's MAC games for the first round games, then reconciled high level efficency stats to replicate the close of the last two conference MAC games as best I could. So, I'm now using those "adjusted adjusted" efficiency stats to create hypo game lines for all possible MAC games, and converting to a win%. The new odds are reflected in the old MAC post, and it's not really true KenPom anymore. I just wanted a better idea of my market equity on Akron and Kent St. should I need to hedge if lucky enough to get either into the finals.
3/10
Would bet Kent St. -11, if I hadn't maxed +1200 to win tourny.
Totals (teams didn't play yesterday)
Kent St. o132.5
Ohio o123.5
Weber St. o131.5
These include observed neutral court and tournament effects on totals. I'm making a scaling adjustment for that, but otherwise using the same totals system.
Bracket Odds / Lunardi
March Madness bracket odds for Lunardi's Monday release is over on the right. Zaga gets a huge boost overperforming ATS last night by 25pts.
Big 10 Tournament / KenPom
Illini +480
Mich +3900
M. St. +250
Minn +3300
NW +4800
OSU +1425
PSU +5025
Purd +290
Wisc +780
Field +7800
No value vs. Greek. The games are in Indianapolis. I have not included any HCA. If you assume Purdue has 2pts HCA, they're +190 fair, and then +250 on Greek has value. I don't know how much HCA the market will assign to these games.
ACC Tournament / KenPom
BC +24650
Clem +1200
Duke +260
FSU +3750
Mary +23150
Mary +23150
Miami +5450
UNC +120
NCST +44500
VT +70900
Wake +660
Field +N/A
Pretty bizarre that on Greek UNC +150 is the only thing that has value here. Obviously it's slim, but Pom rarely has hypo game line bets on UNC, too.
Sunday, March 8, 2009
WAC Tournament / KenPom
Boise +1830
Fresno +15500
Hawaii +12100
Idaho +1680
La Tech +1680
NMS +1575
Nevada +220
SJSU +4620
Utah St. +140
Games are in Reno, giving Nevada 2pts HCA. No value vs. Greek.
SEC Tournament / KenPom
Alab +6175
Ark +57500
Aub +765
Flo +500
Kent +950
LSU +490
Miss +7860
M. St. +2130
S. C. +590
Tenn +415
Vand +2660
Field +N/A
Florida getting 1.5 pts HCA for games in Tampa.
MAC Tournament / Market
Akron +800, Kent St. +1200 (opposite sides of bracket) on Greek. Akron value is medium, Kent St. value is are-you-kidding-me territory.
Akron +490
Ball St. +2310
BG +930
Buffalo +360
CMich +8340
Kent +485
Miami +350
NIU +98440
WMich +16000
Ohio +1680
Field +N/A
Big East Tournament / KenPom
Structure: See Pac 10 link.
Cinci +30000
UConn +340
GTown +2900
LVille +325
Marq +2600
N. D. +14500
Pitt +370
Prov +40000
S. Hall +N/A
Cuse +1700
Nova +1000
W. V. +1000
Field +N/A
Double bye system makes it incredibly difficult to win as a lower seed. West Virginia is 15-1 on Bodog, WV is a team KenPom likes a little more than the market, but there is probably some small value there.
A10 Tournament / KenPom
Structure: See Pac 10 link.
Duqu +3900
La Sa +7300
Mass +12000
R. I. +550
Rich +4300
St. Jo. +4600
St. Lo. +14000
Temp +425
Xavi +150
Field +N/A
Field +N/A
Xaiver +200 and Temple +500 on Greek. Pom has a mancrush on Xavier, so the value is pretty slim if not non-existent. Pom also has a smaller Temple bias on a game basis. Again, nothing to get excited about.
MWC Tournament / KenPom
Structure: See Pac 10 link.
BYU +150
NM +410
SDSU +1020
UNLV +1020
Utah +350
Field +N/A
This includes 2pts HCA for UNLV (games are in Las Vegas). BYU +175 on Greek, but Pom has a giant mancrush on BYU. You'd do better rolling over MLs. No value elsewhere.
B12 Tournament / KenPom
Structure: See Pac 10 link.
Bayl +13000
Kans +250
K. St. +1650
Miss +320
Nebr +8200
Okla +320
O. St. +1375
Texas +1200
T. A&M +5200
Field +N/A
This includes 2pts HCA for the Okahoma teams (games are in OK City). Missouri +350 and Ok St. +1500 seemingly have a little value, but Pom loves Missouri a couple points more than the market, and my 2pts HCA for Oklahoma teams is not necessarily what the market will apply.
Pac10 Tournament / KenPom
Structure: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/champweek2009/news/story?page=ncb_champweek2009#pac10
Ariz +2400
A. St. +570
Cali +1800
Stan +6300
UCLA +130
USC +1200
Wash +425
W. St. +2700
Field +N/A
This includes 2pts HCA for the LA teams (all games in Staples). Small value on ASU +650 on Greek, but not much.
Saturday, March 7, 2009
Finally, lots of run good on some 2H coin flips. Clearly I should be avoiding b2b totals, those didn't go well, not much equity, and I don't have fatigue data - which probably makes the true game system lines irrelevant, hence the micro unit test I guess. Oh well, probably means not a lot of totals betting over the later rounds of the conference tournaments. I suspect I can still generally use spread lines for teams that are similarly fatigued (ie: no one just had a bye).
Conference tournament futures that should be up by Monday. I'll put odds for those after I get a chance to hit. Greek and Bodog are the main books I've seen these from, and I think Bodog might just be copying Greek after Greek's sharpened up. So, be loaded there.
Friday, March 6, 2009
3/7
Sides (all late system, all very small units):
New Mexico -3.5
UTEP -1
Totals:
Cuse o156
Memphis u131.5
UVA u142.5
Stanford o141.5
Boise St. o141.5
Radford o167
Beware the following, not really system plays, since these are all back-to-back games and I don't use a fatigue factor in CBB (usually irrelevant with multiple days off), but the value seems enormous. Maybe fatigue really is worth that much? Putting very cautious units on these:
Yale o129
Northeastern o121 <-best one
Creighton o134
Portland o129
Update: yeah, they're not moving much, but it's micro units so w/e.
2H lines:
halftime mechanical system:
Georgetown u68
Miami u73
game-sub lines (game systems bets, didn't get around to betting)
Pitt o75 +1
Hall +2
Utah u69
GM -4
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Finally getting some 2H help on the totals tonight (as in didn't lose the UC Davis coin flip). Big equity on Cal over which won and was a heavy fave at the half. Ridiculous amount of points in the final minutes of the game- but very few of which I actually needed. Save those pts for an over in jeopardy plz.
3/6
Marymount +14.5 (late system)Also, here's Monday's Lunardi / KenPom, updated through yesterday's games. You can compare with the 3/3 link on the right to see how much a huge over/underperformance moves the odds even this late in the year. Kansas goes from 12-1 to 20-1 with their 30pt+ underperformance vs. Texas Tech.
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Baseball Is Here
Getting started back on the baseball model. BP and crockpot released season win projections, I'll see if I can't work up a reasonable approximation of what some other systems would say.
crockpot: http://playoffodds.blogspot.com/
Chone: http://www.baseballprojection.com/2009standings.htm
Here's some good banter comparing projection systems between the actual publishers of those systems (Nate Silver, tangotiger, etc). I consider PECOTA the gold standard, but it doesn't have a huge leg-up. Its advantage is nearly entirely on the margins. In essence, systems almost always effectively agree, but when PECOTA and another major projection system disagree heavily on a player, PECOTA is going to be more right ~55-60% of the time. The exception to that is probably Chone, where the advantage is very slight.
I'm working on evaluating the systems for the past couple years and coming up with custom projections that just rip off the current systems, but adjusted for demonstrated bias. It might be fruitless, but I'm hoping the sum of the parts, properly evaluated, is a slight improvement over just starting with PECOTA projections to start the year.
I feel like a surprised chicken whenever saying PECOTA in my head.
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Odds to Win Big East
Bodog just threw this up, and they surprisingly did an ok job. In case you've got a horse from that same prop earlier in the year, Pitt and UConn are relatively fair hedges (2/1 and 5/4). This includes all tiebreaker situations. Pitt wins in a three-way tie (15 wins all), Louisville wins in a tie with UConn (16 wins for both).
Louisville .25
Pittsburgh .33
Monday, March 2, 2009
Bracket Odds
New March Madness bracket odds using KenPom on the right for Lunardi's Monday update. Kansas got a big boost in Pom for soulcrushing Missouri (a Pom top 10 team) on Sunday. BYU got one too from beating Utah and SDSU (both Pom top 50) by 10+ points. BYU 250-1 is widely available. Pom is obviously a little high on them, but fair market lines would be ~125-1 using recent game lines as a guide. Shrug, it's still a flier. Lunardi's West Bracket is particularly brutal (Pom #1,2 both in the same region), so everyone's odds there will be a little depressed. The converse is true for Oklahoma's bracket.
Bracketology 101's will be up shortly.
1-0 today on the total. Beat close by 2.5 pts.
3/3
Weber St. -3.5
Youngstown St. +2.5
Milwaukee -7
Totals:
Utah u138
Also someone brought to my attention that opening rounds for some of those tournys aren't neutral site. I'll fix the odds, it might make some mid-seeds decent bets. That'll be done within the hour.
Horizon fixed - that's the only one. It didn't change much.
Greek Tournament Futures / KenPom - CAA
Greek Tournament Futures / KenPom - MVC
Greek Tournament Futures / Kenpom - WCC
WCC Bracket, similar structure. Top two seeds only need to win two games.
Approximate odds:
Gonzaga -210
Pepperdine +N/A
Portland +2300
St. Mary's +300
San Diego +11000
Santa Clara +6100
Field +N/A
Fixed for an override on Santa Clara/San Diego I didn't catch.
I maxed ($300) Gonzaga +100 on Greek. Get it while it's hot. Pom likes Zaga a little more than the market, but not 20% chance to win more. They'll be ~7 point+ favorites (somewhat depends on Mills) in both games, much more over non-St. Mary's teams.
Greek Tournament Futures / KenPom - Horizon
Horizon League tournament KenPom lines:
Odds are heavily stacked against non 1,2 seeds, who have to win two games just to meet the 1,2 seeds.
Odds are heavily stacked against non 1,2 seeds, who have to win two games just to meet the 1,2 seeds.
Approximate odds:
Butler -105
Cleveland St. +575
Detroit +N/A
Green Bay +320
Illinois Chicago +8000
Loyola Chicago +77000
Milwaukee +7800
Valparaiso +90000
Wright St. +1250
Youngstown St. +65000
Cleveland St. +575
Detroit +N/A
Green Bay +320
Illinois Chicago +8000
Loyola Chicago +77000
Milwaukee +7800
Valparaiso +90000
Wright St. +1250
Youngstown St. +65000
No value vs. Greek anymore, plus Pom has a crush on Butler vs. market.
Sunday, March 1, 2009
2-0 sides, both beat close, Buffalo by more than a point.
3-4 totals, crushed close again (54.8% expected vs. close), but had a losing day yet again. This side of variance is not so fun. I'll do the weekly update in a bit, this should be fun/depressing.
Last Week (Record / Win% / eWin%):
All bets: 28-39-3 / 41.8% / 52.5%
Early system spreads: 2-8-1 / 20.0% / 51.4% (now defunct)
Late system spreads: 9-6-0 / 60.0% / 51.4%
Totals: 17-25-2 / 40.5% / 54.2%
Totals are pretty gross. 60% hit rate on totals days were probably over sometime in January. Mid 50%s should still be sustainable just on closing line value.
The Greek
FWIW, Greek should be listing conference tournament winner futures for all the main conferences in a week. They also throw up a lot of March-related props, so I'd highly recommend loading up on Greek. I'll throw up kenpom + market odds here for all the various props/futures they start putting up. Although March opening round game lines should be soft, there's likely to be a lot of value in badly mispriced props/futures.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)